- 07-Sep-2016
- 12-Sep-2016
- 13-Sep-2016
- Re: is COBOL ILE smart enough to move a screen-defined date field *MDY mm/dd/yy to a database-defined *ISO yyyy-mm-dd field?, Jon Paris
- Re: is COBOL ILE smart enough to move a screen-defined date field *MDY mm/dd/yy to a database-defined *ISO yyyy-mm-dd field?, Stone, Joel
- Re: is COBOL ILE smart enough to move a screen-defined date field *MDY mm/dd/yy to a database-defined *ISO yyyy-mm-dd field?, Jon Paris
- Re: is COBOL ILE smart enough to move a screen-defined date field *MDY mm/dd/yy to a database-defined *ISO yyyy-mm-dd field?, Stone, Joel
- Re: is COBOL ILE smart enough to move a screen-defined date field *MDY mm/dd/yy to a database-defined *ISO yyyy-mm-dd field?, Jon Paris
- Re: is COBOL ILE smart enough to move a screen-defined date field *MDY mm/dd/yy to a database-defined *ISO yyyy-mm-dd field?, Stone, Joel
- Re: is COBOL ILE smart enough to move a screen-defined date field *MDY mm/dd/yy to a database-defined *ISO yyyy-mm-dd field?, MichaelQuigley
- Re: is COBOL ILE smart enough to move a screen-defined date field *MDY mm/dd/yy to a database-defined *ISO yyyy-mm-dd field?, Jon Paris
- Re: is COBOL ILE smart enough to move a screen-defined date field *MDY mm/dd/yy to a database-defined *ISO yyyy-mm-dd field?, Jon Paris
- Re: is COBOL ILE smart enough to move a screen-defined date field *MDY mm/dd/yy to a database-defined *ISO yyyy-mm-dd field?, Stone, Joel
- Re: is COBOL ILE smart enough to move a screen-defined date field *MDY mm/dd/yy to a database-defined *ISO yyyy-mm-dd field?, Stone, Joel
- Re: is COBOL ILE smart enough to move a screen-defined date field *MDY mm/dd/yy to a database-defined *ISO yyyy-mm-dd field?, Jon Paris
- Re: is COBOL ILE smart enough to move a screen-defined date field *MDY mm/dd/yy to a database-defined *ISO yyyy-mm-dd field?, Stone, Joel
- COBOL: getting the current date into am *ISO db field, Stone, Joel
- Re: is COBOL ILE smart enough to move a screen-defined date field *MDY mm/dd/yy to a database-defined *ISO yyyy-mm-dd field?, Jon Paris
- 14-Sep-2016
- Good method of using both a PF and an associated LF in the same COBOL program, Stone, Joel
- Re: COBOL400-L Digest, Vol 14, Issue 41, MichaelQuigley
- Re: Good method of using both a PF and an associated LF in the same COBOL program, Winchester Terry
- Re: Good method of using both a PF and an associated LF in the same COBOL program, Stone, Joel
- Re: COBOL400-L Digest, Vol 14, Issue 41, Stone, Joel
- Re: COBOL400-L Digest, Vol 14, Issue 41, Jon Paris
|
|