|
estevens@adrus.com wrote: > > My company is preparing to implement BPCS in an AS/400 environment. We > have several manufacturing plants scattered across the US. Currently, we > have a raging debate over whether to configure a single large database or > multiple databases by plant. Each choice has trade-offs but so far, > nothing has surfaced that has been sufficiently compelling to tip the > scales one way or the other. > > Does anybody have any sage wisdom on this? What might be the performance > implications of accessing a single large DB versus a multiple DB scenario? > If we choose wrong, would it be easier to consolidate multiple DB's at a > later date or easier to break up a single DB into smaller ones? > > Thanks in advance, > > ......Eric > I read your message on the BPCS-L user group. I cann't offer any advice about your specific question but I have a question of my own. I'll be upfront and tell you that I represent a company that sells a data mapping utility that might be handy in your situation. If you are interested, please email me back and I will send you promotional info, answer any questions and even send a demo tape. We have had a lot of sucess with new BPCS users. Mindaugas Bielskus Data Summary, Inc. +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.