|
Wow!. We were on release 2 something for several years then went to 4.02 (skipped 3 because it had a bad rep.), then 405CD... Although 2.00 was a stable release -- and I liked the way billing was handled then - this is a huge step backwards. I imagine a lot of customization was done to it at these other plants (hence the reason for them not moving to BPCS 4.05). From my own experience, I don't think the code in 4.05 CD is that different from release 2. I would try pushing harder for release 4.05 (CD?), heavy customization and all, especially since SSA/GT is trying to make everything else compatible w/ this release. I believe moving back to 2.00 is moving towards eliminating BPCS all together, i.e., support, up-to-date feature, etc. DeeDee Virgei Systems Analyst Nelson Stud Welding, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Jesse Salazar [mailto:jesse.salazar@trin.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:36 AM To: bpcs-l@midrange.com Subject: BPCS 4.05 to 2.00 Due to a merger and internal politics, one of our divisions is being forced to migrate from BPCS 4.05 to 2.00. Would like some feedback/advice on such a move. Thanks. Jesse Salazar Jr., CSP Certified Systems Professional Senior Programmer/Analyst EDI Services Coordinator _______________________________________________ This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list To post a message email: BPCS-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/bpcs-l or email: BPCS-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.