Re: BPCS 5.1 Issues upgrading to OS/400 V5R1

[buser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

   We ran into issues with jobs locking out.  After calling I= BM, they
   advised that we had to change all of our physical and logical file= s to
   Maximum Access Path Size *MAX1TB.  We had to run a program over t= he
   weekend to change these.

   For Example...
   
   CHGPF FILE(BPCSF/IIM) ACCPTHSIZ(*MAX1TB)
   CH= GLF FILE(BPCSF/IIML01) ACCPTHSIZ(*MAX1TB)

   Not su= re if this would be necessary for anyone else, but if you find
   people's job= s going into a TIMW state, then this could be the problem.
       Jerry Hunt
   Neuville Industries Inc.
   -----bpcs-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----

   To: = bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
   From: jdyer@xxxxxxxxxx
   Sent by: bpcs-l-bounces@xx= drange.com
   Date: 04/02/2003 04:38PM
   Subject: BPCS 5.1 Issues upgradin= g to OS/400 V5R1

   APAR II12963 tells us that the S= QL problems were confined to BPCS V6 and
   = above.

   Does the group agree?
   Are there any other caveats we should be aware= of?
   Thanks,
   John G. Dyer, CDP
   Vice Pres= ident
   Information Management Consultants,= Inc.
   jdyer@xxxxxxxxxx
   http://www=.imcedi.com
   812.421.0045 ext. 203