|
midrange.com
Have you done a successful backup, or did you get an error message that
some file could not be backed up because of some problem with some index
or data corruption?
Have you done a reorganization of the allocations? Did it run Ok?
It is always possible that people, in the middle of updating stuff when
the outage occurred, were doing some task where their program left records
out-of-sync. Even though the AS/400 probably has UPS in good condition,
people at work stations, PCs etc. may have been abnormally terminated.
Control files may be different for your version than us on 405 CD ... we
have sometimes done a dump of data areas looking for settings out of
whack. Problem is that when stuff goes haywire, the victims not always
realize they need to notify IT that something needs fixing.
We also have "list various files" all records where an IN USE flag is on.
When everyone off system in evening, there should be no hits.
We are version 6.04, a couple of weeks ago we had a power outage (this
may or may not have anything to do with it), and every since then our
warehouse allocations are not working for one of our warehouses.
We have checked the warehouse maintenance which is flagged for
allocations; we have checked the order maintenance records everything
looks ok there; we have checked the facility planning records which
everything looks ok; Item Master Maintenance looks ok; the pick release
selection options in ord 550 look ok; and the warehouse location
maintenance looks ok. When we put an order in for this particular
warehouse the allocation does not come out on the pick list, nor does it
show in the Inv 300 screen. Can anyone tell us what we missed or what
could possibly be wrong?
Thanks for your help
Susan A. Wyatt
Production Control Coordinator
The Wittern Group
8040 University
Des Moines, IA 50325
515-271-8412
Fax 515-274-5775
SWyatt@xxxxxxxxxxx
Coming together is a beginning, Keeping together is progress, Working
together is success
-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+swyatt=wittern.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[ mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+swyatt=wittern.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
bpcs-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 9:58 AM
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: BPCS-L Digest, Vol 5, Issue 17
Send BPCS-L mailing list submissions to
bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
bpcs-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
bpcs-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of BPCS-L digest..."
*** NOTE: When replying to this digest message, PLEASE remove all text
unrelated to your reply and change the subject line so it is meaningful.
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Delivery to 1 time customer / End-user (Arthur Shaffer)
2. Re: Delivery to 1 time customer / End-user (Peter Heeren)
3. Re: PO Actual Cost (daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
4. Re: PO Actual Cost (Dan Sweeney)
5. Re: PO Actual Cost (daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
message: 1
date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:13:32 -0800 (PST)
from: Arthur Shaffer <abshaffer@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] Delivery to 1 time customer / End-user
Peter,
Who is paying for the parts?
If it the end customer, I would think you would want the customer setup
for A/R.
If not, set up one customer "Spare Parts". Overide the address at order
entry time to be the address for end customer where you are sending the
parts.
Art
----- Original Message ----
From: Peter Heeren <pheeren@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 6:23:25 AM
Subject: [BPCS-L] Delivery to 1 time customer / End-user
Hello BPCS midrange group members,
Our main customers are OEM and Wholesalers.
We have setup the master records (customer master, Ship-to addresses,
pricing, etc) for the order/shipping process.
We are using BPCS 8.2
We are now facing a new challenge for our customer service department.
They have to deliver spare parts to the end-user of our products.
An end user can be compared with a one-time customer, for which we don't
want to set up a customer master, ship to address etc...
Has anyone of you solved this within the standard BPCS functionality?
If not, what 'BPCS interfaced ' partner products are you using?
Kind regards,
Peter Heeren
Please note: This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.
Please notify us immediately if you are not the intended recipient. You
should not copy it, forward it or use it for any purpose or disclose the
contents to any person.
For details of our international offices please visit our website:
http://www.thetford.eu
Thetford B.V. is statutorily based in Etten-Leur, Netherlands. Chamber
of Commerce West-Brabant registration number 20037470.
___________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact Thetford: +31 (0)76-504.23.49
___________________________________________________________________
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list To post a
message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change
list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: abshaffer@xxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
message: 2
date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:04:33 +0100
from: Peter Heeren <pheeren@xxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] Delivery to 1 time customer / End-user
We are already 'mis-using' a standard customer as mentioned in your mail
for free deliveries of service parts and override the address in order
entry or create a ship to address.
When the end user has to pay, we need to set up the ACR customer.
ACR is owned by our accounting department, while order entry for these
parts is done bij our customer service desk.
In this case we need to involve 2 departments for s simple 1-time
delivery.
I was hoping there was a quicker work around.
I was hoping there was an quicker work around.
regards,
Peter
Arthur Shaffer <abshaffer@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bpcs-l-bounces+pheeren=thetford.nl@xxxxxxxxxxxx
19-01-2007 13:23
Please respond to
SSA's BPCS ERP System <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To
"SSA's BPCS ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [BPCS-L] Delivery to 1 time customer / End-user
Peter,
Who is paying for the parts?
If it the end customer, I would think you would want the customer setup
for A/R.
If not, set up one customer "Spare Parts". Overide the address at order
entry time to be the address for end customer where you are sending the
parts.
Art
----- Original Message ----
From: Peter Heeren <pheeren@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 6:23:25 AM
Subject: [BPCS-L] Delivery to 1 time customer / End-user
Hello BPCS midrange group members,
Our main customers are OEM and Wholesalers.
We have setup the master records (customer master, Ship-to addresses,
pricing, etc) for the order/shipping process.
We are using BPCS 8.2
We are now facing a new challenge for our customer service department.
They have to deliver spare parts to the end-user of our products.
An end user can be compared with a one-time customer, for which we don't
want to set up a customer master, ship to address etc...
Has anyone of you solved this within the standard BPCS functionality?
If not, what 'BPCS interfaced ' partner products are you using?
Kind regards,
Peter Heeren
Please note: This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.
Please notify us immediately if you are not the intended recipient. You
should not copy it, forward it or use it for any purpose or disclose the
contents to any person.
For details of our international offices please visit our website:
http://www.thetford.eu
Thetford B.V. is statutorily based in Etten-Leur, Netherlands. Chamber
of
Commerce West-Brabant registration number 20037470.
___________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact Thetford: +31 (0)76-504.23.49
___________________________________________________________________
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: abshaffer@xxxxxxxxx
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: pheeren@xxxxxxxxxxx
___________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact Thetford: +31 (0)76-504.23.49
___________________________________________________________________
Please note: This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.
Please notify us immediately if you are not the intended recipient. You
should not copy it, forward it or use it for any purpose or disclose the
contents to any person.
For details of our international offices please visit our website:
http://www.thetford.eu
Thetford B.V. is statutorily based in Etten-Leur, Netherlands. Chamber
of
Commerce West-Brabant registration number 20037470.
___________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact Thetford: +31 (0)76-504.23.49
___________________________________________________________________
------------------------------
message: 3
date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:59:46 -0500
from: daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost
Thanks guys. The term "expected cost" sounds familiar but if I have
ever
delt with it before it's been long enough that the storage in that part
of
my brain has already been reclaimed. :) Dan's answer brings up another
question--what does PPV stand for?
Still, my original question wasn't about the expected cost field, it was
about the actual cost in PACST. Is that field the total cost from all
receipts against that line, the cost of the last receipt against that
line, or something else? To me it looks like the total but then we
don't
typically have multiple receipts against a single line but that's not to
say that it never happens.
Dave Parnin
--
Nishikawa Standard Company
Topeka, IN 46571
daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Dan Sweeney" <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bpcs-l-bounces+daparnin=niscoseals.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/18/2007 07:53 PM
Please respond to SSA's BPCS ERP System
To: "SSA's BPCS ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "SSA's
BPCS
ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost
Your findings are truw:
Withn the G/L the U transactions will post the std cost that is on the
PO
at the time the PO was entered and will affect the Inventory asset
account and accrued liability.
When the PO is costed by AP the C transaction posts the actual cost from
the AP invoice and measures the PPV against the std cost on the PO vs.
the
actual cost on the AP invoice.
The expected cost will default into the AP invoice.
The actual cost from the AP invoice is a global cost and is not a
facility
cost.
________________________________
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
macwheel99@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu 1/18/2007 5:46 PM
To: SSA's BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost
We recently had a similar confusion on 405 CD & it turns out
that while the rest of BPCS has standard cost, actual cost,
frozen cost, etc. the Purchase Order application has another
cost not found any place else = EXPECTED COST.
What happens is, when the PO is first created, the expected
cost field is a copy of the standard cost, then after the
vendor confirms our PO with the delivery date, pricing etc.
our Purchasing people update the PO with that info. The new
cost goes into the EXPECTED COST, which is what we expect the
actual cost to be.
This impacts a lot of purchasing reports and transactions.
Right now we are trying to reconcile the General Ledger
account where "U" transaction adds value when the inventory
arrives in house, and the "C" transaction when ACP keys in
the vendor invoice. In theory the only money in that account
should be the value of raw materials that arrived, but not
yet the invoices. Reality is a different story.
Also, our SYS800 rules say that everything is to go into BPCS
based on LAST STANDARD COST, but we have found out that some
purchase order transactions go in as LAST ACTUAL COST.
---- Original message ----
>This is a question about a field in the HPO file. We are on
version 4.02.
> There is a field PACST (Actual Cost Total (global)). Is
this the total
>cost of the quantity received so far for that line?
Ultimately, I'm want
>the last invoiced piece price for a query but didn't know if
the user
>would be satisfied with an "average" price. That's what it
looks like is
>here but I wanted to confirm it. Thanks.
>
>
>Dave Parnin
>--
>Nishikawa Standard Company
>Topeka, IN 46571
>daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>--
>This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
>To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
>or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
>
>Delivered-To: macwheel99@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
message: 4
date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:05:33 -0500
from: "Dan Sweeney" <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost
Dave,
PPV = Purchase Price Variance
________________________________
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri 1/19/2007 9:59 AM
To: SSA's BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost
Thanks guys. The term "expected cost" sounds familiar but if I have
ever
delt with it before it's been long enough that the storage in that part
of
my brain has already been reclaimed. :) Dan's answer brings up another
question--what does PPV stand for?
Still, my original question wasn't about the expected cost field, it was
about the actual cost in PACST. Is that field the total cost from all
receipts against that line, the cost of the last receipt against that
line, or something else? To me it looks like the total but then we
don't
typically have multiple receipts against a single line but that's not to
say that it never happens.
Dave Parnin
--
Nishikawa Standard Company
Topeka, IN 46571
daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Dan Sweeney" <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bpcs-l-bounces+daparnin=niscoseals.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/18/2007 07:53 PM
Please respond to SSA's BPCS ERP System
To: "SSA's BPCS ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "SSA's
BPCS
ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost
Your findings are truw:
Withn the G/L the U transactions will post the std cost that is on the
PO
at the time the PO was entered and will affect the Inventory asset
account and accrued liability.
When the PO is costed by AP the C transaction posts the actual cost from
the AP invoice and measures the PPV against the std cost on the PO vs.
the
actual cost on the AP invoice.
The expected cost will default into the AP invoice.
The actual cost from the AP invoice is a global cost and is not a
facility
cost.
________________________________
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
macwheel99@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu 1/18/2007 5:46 PM
To: SSA's BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost
We recently had a similar confusion on 405 CD & it turns out
that while the rest of BPCS has standard cost, actual cost,
frozen cost, etc. the Purchase Order application has another
cost not found any place else = EXPECTED COST.
What happens is, when the PO is first created, the expected
cost field is a copy of the standard cost, then after the
vendor confirms our PO with the delivery date, pricing etc.
our Purchasing people update the PO with that info. The new
cost goes into the EXPECTED COST, which is what we expect the
actual cost to be.
This impacts a lot of purchasing reports and transactions.
Right now we are trying to reconcile the General Ledger
account where "U" transaction adds value when the inventory
arrives in house, and the "C" transaction when ACP keys in
the vendor invoice. In theory the only money in that account
should be the value of raw materials that arrived, but not
yet the invoices. Reality is a different story.
Also, our SYS800 rules say that everything is to go into BPCS
based on LAST STANDARD COST, but we have found out that some
purchase order transactions go in as LAST ACTUAL COST.
---- Original message ----
>This is a question about a field in the HPO file. We are on
version 4.02.
> There is a field PACST (Actual Cost Total (global)). Is
this the total
>cost of the quantity received so far for that line?
Ultimately, I'm want
>the last invoiced piece price for a query but didn't know if
the user
>would be satisfied with an "average" price. That's what it
looks like is
>here but I wanted to confirm it. Thanks.
>
>
>Dave Parnin
>--
>Nishikawa Standard Company
>Topeka, IN 46571
>daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>--
>This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
>To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
>or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
>
>Delivered-To: macwheel99@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
message: 5
date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:57:33 -0500
from: daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost
That makes sense. It's been a long week and my brain is only on half
power today.
"Dan Sweeney" <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bpcs-l-bounces+daparnin=niscoseals.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/19/2007 10:05 AM
Please respond to SSA's BPCS ERP System
To: "SSA's BPCS ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "SSA's
BPCS
ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost
Dave,
PPV = Purchase Price Variance
________________________________
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri 1/19/2007 9:59 AM
To: SSA's BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost
Thanks guys. The term "expected cost" sounds familiar but if I have
ever
delt with it before it's been long enough that the storage in that part
of
my brain has already been reclaimed. :) Dan's answer brings up another
question--what does PPV stand for?
Still, my original question wasn't about the expected cost field, it was
about the actual cost in PACST. Is that field the total cost from all
receipts against that line, the cost of the last receipt against that
line, or something else? To me it looks like the total but then we
don't
typically have multiple receipts against a single line but that's not to
say that it never happens.
Dave Parnin
--
Nishikawa Standard Company
Topeka, IN 46571
daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Dan Sweeney" <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bpcs-l-bounces+daparnin=niscoseals.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/18/2007 07:53 PM
Please respond to SSA's BPCS ERP System
To: "SSA's BPCS ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "SSA's BPCS
ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost
Your findings are truw:
Withn the G/L the U transactions will post the std cost that is on the
PO
at the time the PO was entered and will affect the Inventory asset
account and accrued liability.
When the PO is costed by AP the C transaction posts the actual cost from
the AP invoice and measures the PPV against the std cost on the PO vs.
the
actual cost on the AP invoice.
The expected cost will default into the AP invoice.
The actual cost from the AP invoice is a global cost and is not a
facility
cost.
________________________________
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
macwheel99@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu 1/18/2007 5:46 PM
To: SSA's BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost
We recently had a similar confusion on 405 CD & it turns out
that while the rest of BPCS has standard cost, actual cost,
frozen cost, etc. the Purchase Order application has another
cost not found any place else = EXPECTED COST.
What happens is, when the PO is first created, the expected
cost field is a copy of the standard cost, then after the
vendor confirms our PO with the delivery date, pricing etc.
our Purchasing people update the PO with that info. The new
cost goes into the EXPECTED COST, which is what we expect the
actual cost to be.
This impacts a lot of purchasing reports and transactions.
Right now we are trying to reconcile the General Ledger
account where "U" transaction adds value when the inventory
arrives in house, and the "C" transaction when ACP keys in
the vendor invoice. In theory the only money in that account
should be the value of raw materials that arrived, but not
yet the invoices. Reality is a different story.
Also, our SYS800 rules say that everything is to go into BPCS
based on LAST STANDARD COST, but we have found out that some
purchase order transactions go in as LAST ACTUAL COST.
---- Original message ----
>This is a question about a field in the HPO file. We are on
version 4.02.
> There is a field PACST (Actual Cost Total (global)). Is
this the total
>cost of the quantity received so far for that line?
Ultimately, I'm want
>the last invoiced piece price for a query but didn't know if
the user
>would be satisfied with an "average" price. That's what it
looks like is
>here but I wanted to confirm it. Thanks.
>
>
>Dave Parnin
>--
>Nishikawa Standard Company
>Topeka, IN 46571
>daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>--
>This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
>To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
>or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
>
>Delivered-To: macwheel99@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) digest list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
End of BPCS-L Digest, Vol 5, Issue 17
*************************************
______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned by Managed Email Content Service, using
Skeptic(tm) technology powered by MessageLabs.
______________________________________________________________________
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: macwheel99@xxxxxxxxxxx
-
Al Macintyre
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AlMac
http://www.ryze.com/go/Al9Mac
BPCS/400 Computer Janitor ... see
http://radio.weblogs.com/0107846/stories/2002/11/08/bpcsDocSources.html
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
