Re: ILE performance and code reuse -- C400-L

Subject: Re: ILE performance and code reuse
From: Dave McKenzie <davemck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 07:24:24 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/c400-l>
List-help: <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: C programming iSeries / AS400 <c400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:c400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/c400-l>, <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/c400-l>, <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Static calls between modules are about as quick as function invocations
within C, so I would leave it as an RPG module.

--Dave

Boris wrote:

Hi
there is an RPG ILE program that has certain functionality that I need in my 
C program. So I created an ILE module from the RPG program and statically 
bound it. Now the question is that the RPG program will be called probably 
millions of times during the program execution. Can I rely on the statically 
bound call performance or it would be wiser to implement the same 
functionality as a part of the C program?

Thanks
Boris

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.