On 30/01/2010, at 9:33 AM, hockchai Lim wrote:
Some how I though long is 8 bytes (64 bits) and int is 4 bytes (32
bits).
Nope, a long long is 8 bytes. An int could be 2 bytes or 4 bytes
depending on compiler implementation which in turn depends on the
target hardware capabilities.
Generally:
char 1-byte
short int 2-bytes
int 4-bytes
long int 4-bytes
long long 8-bytes
By declaring a long you are informing the compiler you want the longer
type (i.e. a 4-byte value) where a plain int might give you 2-bytes on
certain C compilers. Even so, the compiler writers could choose to
only support 2-byte integers in which case short, int, and long would
all give the same allocation.
I wonder what is the reason for long and int types if they both are 4
bytes long.
Historical.
From the K&R book:
:quote.
Plain int objects have the natural size suggested by the host machine
architecture; the other sizes are provided to meet special needs.
Longer integers provide at least as much storage as short ones, but
the implementation may make plain integers equivalent to either short
integers or long integers.
:equote.
Thus declaring a plain int could result in different storage
allocations (i.e. sizes) on different hardware or even with a
different compiler on the same hardware. Much less of an issue now
than it once was (indeed now probably non-existent) but was one of the
"joys" of porting C code to different platforms.
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
midrange.com
