|
now I see it. If the program are missing you'll have to rely
on other means.
How do you even know if a program is missing if you don't have
a list somewhere?
Some source code or change management tools seem in
order.
The bare minimum is a CL-program that you used to bind the
program.
You don't do this "by hand" do you?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 8:24
AM
Subject: ILE - module overwiew - more
detailed question
Hello.
I want to be more exact in my question: If I, in
ILE-environment , for some reason, want to recreate some programs(the programs
can be missing, but the source library containing the module-sources is
available f. ex.), can I then find somewhere which modules the programs
originally contained? Or do I have to keep track of that with 'feather
and ink' on my desk.
Mvh.
Geir
|
| geir.kildal@entragroup.com
Sent by: owner-cobol400-l@midrange.com
26.07.01 10:10
Please respond to COBOL400-L
|
To:
COBOL400-L@midrange.com
cc:
Subject: ILE - module
overwiew? |
Hello.
I'm still working my way into ILE: In the
OPM-world, all nessecary kode for a program is kept in the source
member(except copys), and compiling the source gives you a runnable program.
The program overwiew is kept in the source files.
In the
ILE-world, a program can be put together from several modules(each module has
its own sourcecode). Then I come to my question: What is the best
way of keeping track of which modules goes into which programs? This can
obviously be a big problem unless it is kept in some code
somewhere(CL-pgms keeping the info???)
What is common practice/wise to
do?
Mvh.
Geir Kildal
|
midrange.com
