|
Joe, Well, I think ILE/RPG has some pretty neat stuff that COBOL does rather poorly. Too bad the best features of both languages couldn't be merged together :) Even though Cobol is "wordy", when written properly, even a "layman" (non-programmer) can read it and make some sense of the logic. I believe this was one of the original specifications in the early design of the language. Terry > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Pluta [mailto:joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 10:23 AM > To: cobol400-l@midrange.com > Subject: RE: Need for separate Input and Output Areas in Display File > > > > From: Winchester Terry > > > > Joe, > > <snipped for bandwidth> > > > > The above case is where you run into overlapping structures > > due to the "redefines" statement inserted by the compiler. > > This can cause horrific problems and is best avoided if at > > all possible. > > <ROFL> > > My COBOL newbie-ness is showing! But as you can see from my > last post, I did at least notice that my code was different. > As Leif says, COBOL is much more flexible than RPG, but with > that flexibility lies more responsibility. > > I have to say this - for an RPG guy, COBOL is wordy and there > is a lot of typing. But it sure does allow for some pretty > powerful programming techniques. > > Joe >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.