|
I'm a bit confused. How would this be any different than defining a data structure in RPG and using that as the parameter? I hardly ever do that. - Dan --- "Stone, Joel" <StoneJ@GourmetAward.com> wrote: > I would suggest that you could be asking for trouble by naming each > parm > field. > > For example, lets say this program is called in 50 pgms, and you > decide in 6 > months that you want to add P1300-Start-Date as a parm. > > The way you have set this up, you would have to hand-modify 50 pgms > plus the > called pgm. > > If you change it to "CALL 'PD1300RG' USING 1300RG-PARMS and list > P1300-Start-Date as an "05" field underneath an "01" level, then you > would > simply recompile the 50 programs. You would not have to modify the > 50 > programs!! > > That is a BIG maintenance issue, imo. > > If you were to leave a filler field to accomodate a few new fields, > then you > would not have to even re-compile the programs (except where the new > field > needs to be referenced). __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.