|
Wouldn't it be simpler (and a whole lot prettier) to combine the four flags into a single field and use that as the comparison key to search an array containing the patterns - then just use the resulting index to increment the appropriate pattern element? Like so (not tested so ....) Working-Storage Section. 01 Patterns. 05 Current-Pattern. 10 RS-SUMG Pic x. 10 RS-SUMW Pic x. 10 RS-FALLG Pic x. 10 RS-FALLW Pic x. 05 Pattern-Values. 10 Filler Pic x(4) value "X ". 10 Filler Pic x(4) value " X ". 10 Filler Pic x(4) value " X ". 10 Filler Pic x(4) value " X". 10 Filler Pic x(4) value "X ". * etc. etc. for the rest of the patterns 05 Pattern-Array Redefines Pattern-Values Pic x(4) occurs 14. 01 Pattern-Counts. 05 Pattern-Index Pic S9(3) Comp-3. 05 Pattern Pic S9(5) Comp-3 Occurs 14. Procedure Division. Process-It. Search Pattern-Array varying Pattern-Index when Pattern-Array(Pattern-Index) = Current-Pattern Add 1 to Pattern(Pattern-Index). Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.