Re: Cobol / CL question -- COBOL400-L

Subject: Re: Cobol / CL question
From: Jon Paris <Jon.Paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:56:23 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/cobol400-l>
List-help: <mailto:cobol400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: COBOL Programming on the iSeries/AS400 <cobol400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:cobol400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cobol400-l>, <mailto:cobol400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cobol400-l>, <mailto:cobol400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 12-Mar-09, at 4:00 PM, Chris Chambers wrote:

I would always call a CL program from within the COBOL.

QCMDEXC is just so ugly

And CL is therefore by definition "pretty"? You are jesting surely.

Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.