ILE COBOL setting ACTGRP(name-group) -- COBOL400-L

Subject: ILE COBOL setting ACTGRP(name-group)
From: Jeff Buening <JeffBuening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:28:25 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/cobol400-l>
List-help: <mailto:cobol400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: COBOL Programming on the iSeries/AS400 <cobol400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:cobol400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cobol400-l>, <mailto:cobol400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cobol400-l>, <mailto:cobol400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Does ILE COBOL CRTBNDCBL have a way in the PROCESS statement to set the
compiler to always compile a program in ACTGRP(name-activation) (whatever I
choose for the name-activation)? I have noticed ILE RPG has an H-Spec that
seems to do this, but have not found anything for ILE COBOL. The problem
is that I want to use ILE COBOL with WDSC but others still use PDM and OPM,
so what to make sure they get the correct default if they compile. If this
isn't an option why has IBM not done this?

Thanks,
Jeff Buening

Programmer/Analyst
jeff.buening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 419-586-8599
FAX #: 419-586-6224
www.celinainsurance.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: ILE COBOL setting ACTGRP(name-group) , Jon Paris

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.