LD01159 vs FP67031 -- DOMINO400

Subject: LD01159 vs FP67031
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 09:38:22 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/domino400>
List-help: <mailto:domino400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Lotus Domino on the iSeries / AS400 <domino400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:domino400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/domino400>, <mailto:domino400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/domino400>, <mailto:domino400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

New install of Domino 7.0.3 on a V6R1 machine. On all previous 7.0.3
machines I had LD01159. New install instructions say to use FP67031.
However all it says on previous hot fixes was to cross reference this and
that. I don't want to do that. I simply want to know if I should remove
LD01159 or not. Actually, it would be even better if I didn't have to
concern myself with removing fix packs but apparently Domino isn't quite
up to LPP standards for ptf application.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.