Re: QFileSvr.400 authority issue

This may be a bit 'off the wall' but IBM Enterprise Identity Mapping (EIM)
happily lets users sign on with Password *NONE. It uses alternate forms of
authentication such as Kerberos. Maybe it will work for QNOTES?

See http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246975.html for more on EIM.

Regards,

John Taylor
Chairman, Typex Group plc



From: <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Lotus Domino on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries)"
<domino400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 22/01/2013 16:52
Subject: Re: QFileSvr.400 authority issue
Sent by: <domino400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


Ok the issue is that QNOTES has
Password is *NONE . . . . . . . . . . . . : *YES

Is there a problem if I go and assign a password, and,
change "Password expiration interval" *NONE for QNOTES on all lpars?
Realizing that every time I upgrade Domino I may have to do a CHGUSRPRF
QNOTES.


Rob Berendt