Re: Suggested fix pack

[Chris Whisonant <chris.whisonant@xxxxxxxxx>]

9.0 is being built off of what the 8.5.4 codestream was originally going to
be. Honestly, I would go with 9.0. It's supposed to break the barrier that
most people have with .0 releases by being really stable. We've been
running it for our mail and ldap server for a little while now.


---------------------------------------------------

Thanks,
Chris
Personal Blog: http://cwhisonant.blogspot.com
Work Blog: http://www.bleedyellow.com/blogs/lotusnut


On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:10 PM, <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm at:  Lotus Domino (r) Server (Release 8.5.3FP1 for i5/OS)
> FP2&3 are out.  Should I just stay the course and wait for 8.5.3FP4 or
> what?
>
> http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/fixlist.nsf/%28Progress%29/$First?OpenDocument
>
> Release number:  Notes and Domino 9.0 Social Edition
> Est. release date:  Q1 2013
>
> Release number:  8.5.4
> Est. release date:  Q3 2013
>
> Release number:  8.5.3 FP4
> Est. release date:  April 2013
>
>
>
> Rob Berendt
> --
> IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1
> Group Dekko
> Dept 1600
> Mail to:  2505 Dekko Drive
>           Garrett, IN 46738
> Ship to:  Dock 108
>           6928N 400E
>           Kendallville, IN 46755
> http://www.dekko.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Lotus Domino on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (Domino400)
> mailing list
> To post a message email: Domino400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/domino400
> or email: Domino400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/domino400.