Re: Traveler 9.0.0.1 or 9.0.1? -- DOMINO400

Subject: Re: Traveler 9.0.0.1 or 9.0.1?
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 13:34:52 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/domino400>
List-help: <mailto:domino400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Lotus Domino on the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <domino400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:domino400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/domino400>, <mailto:domino400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/domino400>, <mailto:domino400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

That is what Walter says. However, my Windows coworker is pitching a fit
because it would mean spinning up a new vm ware server, loading newer
domino, traveler, on windows , just for a days worth of use. The os of
the existing server does not support Traveler 9.
And would that upgrade then mean anything that's in

The entire directory of <data>/traveler/ntsdb.

would get moved to:

ntsclcache.nsf

Is that really the explanation of the discrepancy?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Traveler 9.0.0.1 or 9.0.1? , rob
Re: Traveler 9.0.0.1 or 9.0.1? , stevepitcher

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.