Death of multiversioning? -- DOMINO400

Subject: Death of multiversioning?
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 07:23:12 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/domino400>
List-help: <mailto:domino400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Lotus Domino on the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <domino400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:domino400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/domino400>, <mailto:domino400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/domino400>, <mailto:domino400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Is multiversioning still supported?
I have a PMR open in which IBM complained the reason I am having a failure
is that my Java group is too new. My group ptf level should be SIX levels
behind what is currently available now for my IBM i 7.1 server supporting
a Domino 8.5.3 server.
On the other hand, for Domino 9, I need to be more current on my Java
group PTFs:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475&context=SSKTWP&context=SSKTMJ&q1=1305543&uid=swg21305543&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Death of multiversioning? , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.