Re: EGL: Integration or Migration? -- EGL-I

Subject: Re: EGL: Integration or Migration?
From: Jon Paris <Jon.Paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:35:44 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/egl-i>
List-help: <mailto:egl-i-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: EGL on and around the IBM i <egl-i.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:egl-i@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/egl-i>, <mailto:egl-i-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/egl-i>, <mailto:egl-i-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 5-Jun-08, at 4:24 PM, Joe Pluta wrote:

The fact that EGL generates COBOL might address that issue, but somebody
needs to prove to me that high-end applications can be written that way.

Am I correct in assuming Joe that COBOL generation is only usable in a batch program environment? If that is the case, then the COBOL generation won't help with much of what folks want to use it for.

Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: EGL: Integration or Migration? , Joe Pluta

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.