Re: EGL: Integration or Migration? -- EGL-I

Subject: Re: EGL: Integration or Migration?
From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <thunderaxiom@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 02:28:01 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/egl-i>
List-help: <mailto:egl-i-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: EGL on and around the IBM i <egl-i.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:egl-i@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/egl-i>, <mailto:egl-i-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/egl-i>, <mailto:egl-i-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

john e skrev den 06-06-2008 11:05:

OS. Java is not straightforward and is not integrated because IBM did not
invest in it because of lack of interest. The straightforward approach ensures

I don't think you are right here. The basic problem with Java as I see it on the AS/400 is that it MUST always support threads, which on the i (as I understand it) means a lot of trouble if you are in a thread-unsafe mode.

How should Java be integrated to work satisfactory to you?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.