Re: Java/400 Performance: Good News and Bad News

[Gary L Peskin <garyp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Joe --

You've done a terrific job and a lot of work!  Was this all with
bytecode?  Was JIT enabled or disabled?  Was there any compiled Java
involved?

It certainly is disappointing that the 400 runs so much slower than the
client, which I assume was some flavor of Windows.

Given IBM's betting the farm on Java, I think they'd better start
milking the cows faster if they want to save the farm.

-- 
Gary L Peskin
The Firstech Corporation
+1.323.658.1146
http://www.simdate.com


pluta@nexgensoftware.com wrote:
> 
> Recently in the News/400 forum, a couple of readers and I have begun a thread 
>on
> testing Java/400 performance. (The URL is
> http://www.news400.com/Forums/Thread.cfm?CFApp=36&Thread_ID=9888&mc=13 if 
>you're
> interested in following the thread.) I've spent quite a bit of time over the
> last week putting together a test bed. Well, last night (this morning <sigh>) 
> ...
+---
| This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net
+---