Re: JDBC version vs JDK -- JAVA400-L

Subject: Re: JDBC version vs JDK
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 20:46:40 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400<java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>,<mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>,<mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

At 07:53 PM 8/12/2003, you wrote:

However, the version of db2_classes.jar in /QIBM/ProdData/Java400/jdk/ext
supports only JDBC 3.0 which requires JDK 1.4 for, among other things, the
java.sql.Savepoint interface.

Any reason not to install JDK 1.4?

david

Follow-Ups:

RE: JDBC version vs JDK , Gary L Peskin

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.