RE: framework question -- JAVA400-L

Subject: RE: framework question
From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:54:50 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

> From: Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)
> 
> but to say "...can
> be done just as EASILY in RPG" is only true if you are 'doing simple
RPG
> modules'.

Why?  Why is it any harder to define you namespace (com.bartell) and
then use that as the beginning (COMBARTELL_) of your procedure names?

I guess I just don't get it.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: framework question , Joe Pluta

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.