Re: Why does CRTJVAPGM take so long sometimes? -- JAVA400-L

Subject: Re: Why does CRTJVAPGM take so long sometimes?
From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <thunderaxiom@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:27:13 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Urbanek, Marty skrev den 27-09-2007 14:08:

If you are on V5R4, have you tried using the new J9 JVM? It is supposed
to be a standard JVM, so maybe it would not do that.

I did some quick experiments with it in the Value Loaner Programe. Basically the speed was the same as the classic JVM, so the primary reason for changing would be memory usage. I also believe that it generates native code instead of MI.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.