RE: Subprocedure invocation (was on RPG List) -- JAVA400-L

Subject: RE: Subprocedure invocation (was on RPG List)
From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:10:47 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

From: David Gibbs

Joe Pluta wrote:

Correct. setMyvar and getMyvar ("isMyvar" in the case of a Boolean) are
conventions. However, they're conventions that are followed by all IDEs

and

indeed are required by certain J2EE functions. If you DON'T name your
getters and setters properly, you will probably cause yourself some

extra

complexity down the road.

It's the basis of the whole Bean concept, isn't it?

Yup. Beans require conventional naming.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Subprocedure invocation (was on RPG List) , David Gibbs

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.