Re: DataQueue performance jt400Native 10x slower then RPG -- JAVA400-L

Subject: Re: DataQueue performance jt400Native 10x slower then RPG
From: Jack Woehr <jwoehr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:21:04 -0600
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the IBM i <java400-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 9:48 AM Steinmetz, Paul via JAVA400-L <
java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

RPG is the original native language for the I, and will probably
outperform any other language.
There have been several performance papers written on this, one of which
below.

Java is slower than RPG. But the primary antipattern in Java usage is
loading the JVM every time some interaction takes place.

Is this a Java program that sits there accepting socket connections, or
does it load every time you need one thing?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: DataQueue performance jt400Native 10x slower then RPG , Franz . Rauscher

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.