Subversion -- LINUX5250

Subject: Subversion
From: Carey Evans <carey.evans@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 22:59:45 +1200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250>
List-help: <mailto:linux5250-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Linux 5250 Development Project <linux5250.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:linux5250@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/linux5250>, <mailto:linux5250-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/linux5250>, <mailto:linux5250-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Now that Sourceforge is offering Subversion as well as CVS, and since
we're going to have to check out everything again anyway now, does
anyone have any feelings about migrating TN5250 development from CVS to
Subversion?

I easily prefer Subversion, especially for its repository-wide atomic
commits, better branching, and support for renaming and rearranging
files and directories.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Subversion , Holger Schurig
Re: Subversion , James Rich
Re: Subversion , Scott Klement

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.