• Subject: Re: Closing Manufacturing Orders
  • From: Gcschramm@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 14:48:37 EDT

     I agree that the additional material transaction to complete material,
and the additional shop transaction to complete labor seem in most cases to
be redundant.  But Patrick asked about closing with a "C".  That is a normal
close, which tells me the order is already at 55 with PC&C or 45 without PC&C
interfacing.  In this case, selecting by date is possible, and certainly
easier than putting a "C" in each order.  If he were forcing them closed with
an "F", I would understand wanting to simplify the process.  In this case, I
think Jonathan's solution is appropriate, since, as I said, it usually is
redundant to do the completion RM transaction.
      

George C. Schramm, CPIM
Custom Systems Corporation
973.383.7808

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.