I agree that the additional material transaction to complete material,
and the additional shop transaction to complete labor seem in most cases to
be redundant. But Patrick asked about closing with a "C". That is a normal
close, which tells me the order is already at 55 with PC&C or 45 without PC&C
interfacing. In this case, selecting by date is possible, and certainly
easier than putting a "C" in each order. If he were forcing them closed with
an "F", I would understand wanting to simplify the process. In this case, I
think Jonathan's solution is appropriate, since, as I said, it usually is
redundant to do the completion RM transaction.
George C. Schramm, CPIM
Custom Systems Corporation
973.383.7808
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.