Re: scheduling

["De Vlieger Kris" <devlieger.kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

George,

 

I am sorry if you got the wrong impression, mabe because some "subtones" came over wrong(English is not my mothertongue).  I was not being sarcastic when I said it's a fine product and I meant literally what I said: "Thanks for confirming my first choice", and you are right again: real finite packages usual surpass the finite dollars available

Thanks again

----- Original Message -----

From: Gcschramm@aol.com

To: MAPICS-L@midrange.com

Sent: Thursday, 12 July, 2001 09:31 PM

Subject: Re: scheduling

Kris,
I did not mean to suggest that it is a bad product.  I just don't know.  It
sounded like it might fill your need.  If you start getting into real finite
packages, MAPICS or otherwise, you are usually into large dollars.

George C. Schramm, CPIM
Custom Systems Corporation
610.417.3686