On Thu, 18 October 2001, "Dennis Lovelady" wrote:

> Well, naturally sales of the higher model started to fall not long after
> this, and IBM figured out why.  Those who had chosen this method of upgrade,
> IBM presented an upgrade bill to.  The whole issue ended up being tested in
> court.  So now there are laws governing this, saying basically that a
> manufacturer can't legally charge more for a product whose only difference
> is that it has less parts, or some such.  IBM lost on that one and had to
> find more devious ways of engineering their various models of systems.

Can't say anything about that case; but around '71-'72, we upgraded a 2311 disk 
subsystem for a 1401 from 2.5MB to 5MB (IIRC). The CE removed a stop-screw that 
had prevented the disk arm from fully traversing the platters. Voila! Doubled 
capacity! If a customer did that without purchasing the upgrade, I suspect 
IBM's recourse would be under voided warranty, etc.

Tom Liotta

--
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788
Fax  253-872-7904
http://www.400Security.com


___________________________________________________
The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
 Better!  Faster! More Powerful!
 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
 http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/






As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.