|
midrange.com
Leif is correct. The optimizer can do more for ILE than OPM (MI). Across a
series of dependent compute-intensive operations, this can make a big
difference in performance. Ideally, you want most of the intermediate bit
values to be maintained in registers; the optimizer can do that for ILE.
In an MI program, intermediate results must be stored, which inhibits many
optimizations.
On 12/20/2001 at 09:12:01 PM, mi400-admin@midrange.com wrote:
it will not be faster because the HLL is C.
It might be faster because the optimizer does a very good job
and is used for C but not for MI. I had the same experience
when coding AES in both MI and C.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
