|
>> AFAIK, IBM does not develop OS/400 on the AS/400 but on RS/6000 or equivalent. OS/400 images or objects are then transferred over ...... So the whole "infrastructure" around the source of OS/400 must also be opened up. Very likely, the developers (us) must adopt a similar way of working (i.e. not using the AS/400 as our development platform). You can (sorta) use the same platform as Rochester if you wish - I believe it is based on the Carnegie Melon Andrew workbench. Not sure how much is still done on the VM systems - the 400s are powerful enough now. In the S/38 and early 400 days there were two problems, no version control/build tool that was complex enough and could run on the S/38 etc. Also there was not enough horsepower to do the builds so the MI object was built on VM and then downloaded for the final part of the build - even that was slower than Christmas! I think the builds are now done on a combination of RS/6000 and iSeries - possibly the really old stuff like SEU <grin> RPG/400 and COBOL/400 are still done on the big iron - not even certain of that. Jon Paris Partner400
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.