|
mi400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 05/18/2004 10:02:56 AM: > Is there data that suggests that this routine is as efficient or better than > calling the QMH message APIs to remove the message? The C-style branch-point handler with a control action of _CTLA_HANDLE_NO_MSG is more efficient than calling the message handler APIs. I don't know how this technique compares with other suggestions. Bob Donovan/Rochester/IBM, Dept GZA, Rochester, MN 507-253-4036 t/l: 553-4036 rjd@xxxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
