|
> -----Original Message----- > From: mi400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx / Bob Cozzi > Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 11:14 AM > > How about just moving the '11000000' strings into an 8-element array and > xFoot the array? If the result if 2, you've got a 2-bit number of it is 3 > you've got your 3-bit numbers. How do I get to '11000000' in the first place? Did I increment by one all the way up to 192 to get there, throwing out all of the non-2-bit numbers on the way there? That might be fine for a small total number of amounts, but when you start looking at a list of hundreds of amounts, I think I'd spend a huge percentage of time throwing out all of the non-2-bit numbers. I am starting to think that this problem requires another array that I can't quite put in words (there's a horrendous machine buzzing in my background all morning - need to get some noise-cancelling headphones). Essentially, it would be an array of integers that would have as many elements as there would be the number amount of combinations as I want to test for. In my first iteration, only elements 1 & 2 would be used. Element1 is set to 1 and element2 is set to 2. Increment element2 until get to the high limit, then add 1 to element1 and set element2 to (element1 + 1). Once I get to the end of 2-bit combos, set e1 to 1, e2 to 2, and e3 to 3, and repeat the process as described for the 2-bit combos. Does that make any sense? tia, db
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.