Re: QPROCT and QPRODT

["James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Richard Thomas wrote:
> "MXD is the same as POS and HI" - Agreed, when you look at the generated
> code within a program. I'm not disputing this.
>
> I naively expected QPRCRTPG to enforce instruction-specific synonyms for the
> indicator/branch forms in the IRP (e.g. POS on ADDN is OK, but MXD and HI
> aren't).

Why should it care, when the synonyms only exist for the purpose of 
making the source code easier for us lowly humans to read?

--
JHHL