Re: pdm vs year 2000

[Neil Palmer <npalmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

telsci wrote:
> 
> The thing that's WRONG with this implementation is that we have spent time
> and money working on a 50 year postponement of the problem.  Are we all
> assuming the AS/400 will be obsolete by then?  

Maybe not - but any source code you have from today that you would want
to maintain with PDM probably would be obsolete (as would PDM?).   :-)

-- 
... Neil Palmer                                      AS/400~~~~~      
... NxTrend Technology - Canada      ____________          ___  ~     
... Markham,  Ontario,  Canada       |OOOOOOOOOO| ________  o|__||=   
... Phone: (905) 731-9000 x238       |__________|_|______|_|______)   
... url:http://www.nxtrend.com        oo      oo   oo  oo   OOOo=o\   
... mailto:npalmer@nxtrend.com     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* This is the Midrange System Mailing List!  To submit a new message,   *
* send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".  To unsubscribe from     *
* this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify            *
* 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.  Questions      *
* should be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com   *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *