|
We are gearing up to do our Year 2000 conversion. What we have decided so far is that: 1) We will be expanding our files to include the century in all date fields; and 2) On all screens and reports, we will leave the date as a 6 digit representation (unless an exception is absolutely necessary). We are considering purchasing a tool by Advanced Systems Concepts called Century Update, which provides analysis and conversion functionality. Our greatest debate is whether or not to use native dates or to go to an 8 digit numeric YYYYMMDD for our file date fields. Any suggestions, advice, horror stories, etc. would be appreciated. Please email me directly if you do not want to publish a reply to the mailing list. TIA, Susan Durrie sed1@earthlink.net * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This is the Midrange System Mailing List! To submit a new message, * * send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". To unsubscribe from * * this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify * * 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message. Questions * * should be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.