RE: Numeric DATE Fields vs DATE fieldtype

[Bob Cozzi <BobCozzi@xxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday, June 11, 1997 10:04 AM, ConnectY2K@aol.com 
[SMTP:ConnectY2K@aol.com] wrote:
>
> SOUNDS  reasonable - how does that fit to most Y2K tools.  Not just
> Bypass2000 that you mentioned.
>

As far as I can tell, the main-stream (if you can call any of them that) do 
NOT convert to native date field types. None, as far as I know, convert to 
9-digit decimals. But 8-digit numeric are everywhere.

Bob Cozzi
Bob@rpgdev.net
http://www.rpgdev.net


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* This is the Midrange System Mailing List!  To submit a new message,   *
* send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".  To unsubscribe from     *
* this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify            *
* 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.  Questions      *
* should be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com   *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *