Re: CA/400 Win95 Twinax problems

[Bill Robins <brobins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>I, and I'm sure hundreds (thousands?) of others also pi**ed away untold
>hours of time trying to get Twinax emulation working in the original
>releases of CA/400 for Win95, and the fact that Rochester KNEW about >the 
>problem, that they did NOT spread the word to customers - OR EVEN >THEIR OWN 
>SUPPORT STAFF - is TOTALLY INEXCUSABLE - and I FULLY support >what Bob 
>did/said at COMMON.  It took FAR too long for this to be >resolved (and even 
>now it's really only solved with the new 5250 >Express twinax cards for many 
>people - which you of course have to >buy!).  Someone had to wake them up and 
>get their heads out of their >a**es !! (Ooops - I probably should have been 
>'P.C.' and said "get >their heads out of the sand").


But, both you and Bob are missing one of the big points in my reply. 
His statement was made without qualifications.  Of course he is
justified in criticizing IBM, anyone is who has had to struggle through
this mess.  Unless I am forgetting parts of his statement at the
soundoff it ran along the lines of "Bob Cozzi, blah blah, I think Client
Access is a piece of crap.  Thank you." Yes, this is an outrageous
paraphrase, but is this not the jest of what was shared?

Bill Robins
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
|    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---