|
Wiesmayr Rudolf <Rudolf.Wiesmayr@mag.linz.at> wrote: >OK. But I want to have any chance to examine my bottleneck routine. >There are cases where a short look at the generated code should make clear >if there is a chance for a better algorithm. When I see a single instruction >(and I heard of very powerful instructions doing a lot of things deep down in >the machine) instead of a long sequence I'd not try to reformulate the HLL >code and go concerning the next possibility... I know exactly what you mean. But, these days, optimizing back-ends are good - damn good in fact. What it means is that when using high optimization, the final machine code bears little resemblance to the original source code. It may not be possible to determine exactly what sequence of machine instructions corresponds to a particular HLL statement. Cheers! Hans Hans Boldt, ILE RPG Development, IBM Toronto Lab, hboldt@vnet.ibm.com +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com | and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.