|
Al This certainly has proved an interesting thread to follow. Summary Observation: If you tie your quest together with John Carr's "The Graying COMMON" there is a message of future interest and perhaps a pointer towards survival of this wonderful product. A message here is that people are important. As important as growing the machine install base and selling new systems[accounts]. Who are the Execs that are leaving? Are there specific departments or locations that at hit? Glenn ==================================== At 03:58 PM 12/3/97 +0000, you wrote: >Hi, > >This is really an open letter to IBM Rochester/Somers, with a cc: to >midrange-l. I have reversed the addresses for reasons that will become >obvious below. > >Well, it's been over two months since I made my comments at Soundoff about >the lack of AS/400 marketing communications and AS/400 Education. (These >comments are available electronically, but I have NO intention of >broadcasting them publically.) It's fair to say that some at IBM were >unhappy with my Soundoff comments, yet others were happy with my comments. > >Many unhappy IBM execs responded by indicating that the only people who >held this opinion were consultants. Whereas, it is plausible that this >might be true, however I AM OF THE OPINION that anyone who holds that >belief has an IQ so low that when you square it, you get a lower number. >On the otherhand, maybe I am a cretin (I know of an IBM VP who thought so, >but he's gone now!), and that everyone else is all correct. After all, it >was the same group of people who told me I was 'all wrong about V3R1'. (It >would be fair to note that I understand more about the IBM marketing and >education processes now, that I did at Soundoff, but I want this work to be >reflective of the perception in the marketplace today. I may be commenting >on these things in the future.) > >Never the less, my note to Midrange-L spawned about 115 responses. As many >of you have asked, I have retained all of these responses. (I eliminated >irrelevant responses and redundant at-a-boys.... ) > >I am looking for an IBM volunteer to compile a summary of the responses. I >ask for an IBM volunteer, because there are many IBM execs with a lot of >time on their hands now, given the fact that they have already been >(informally) told that they will be pink slipped on Dec 9. These execs are >looking for other jobs within the corporation, and a good analytical piece >of work might help their job hunting. (Although many to-be-pink-slipped >IBMers are working very hard at wrapping up projects [*WARPSPEED], there >are many others who are expending less than a full effort [*IMPULSEPOWER] >and have time on their hands. I am looking for a volunteer, with the >backing of the AS/400 Division (or whatever it's called today). Don't get >me wrong, there could also be an remaining IBMer who could champion this >cause, and delegate the work; never-the-less this a busy time at IBM. ( >(SOAPBOX(*ON) It's fourth quarter, and systems are FINALLY selling. >However the timing of our announcements is the subject of a different note. > SOAPBOX(*OFF) ). > >So, I'm calling IBMers to respond this week, with AS/400 Division backing. >If no one comes forward, I will be looking for non-IBMers. This raw data >is volatile (both good and bad), and I only intend to release it to someone >whom I considered responsible and qualified. (The decision of the judges >are final.) > >Lacking an IBM volunteer (who I consider would be a relatively impartial >individual, possibly biased to IBM), I will then be looking for a non-IBM >volunteer (who plausibly would be less favorably inclined to IBM). (SO >IBM, HERE'S YOUR CHANCE, DON'T BLOW IT.) > >Regardless of who does the work, I plan to audit the results. If I find >the results to be innacurate, I don't know what I'll do, however I would be >willing to share those results with anyone IBMer/non-IBMer with a need to >know basis. (The decisions of the judges is final.) > >I have blind-copied this letter to a list of IBMers. My intent was not to >single out any specific IBMers, because this is a Divisional problem as >opposed to an individual problem. Trust me my bcc: is long enough that >someone at IBM should care and pick up the work (assuming that there's >someone left who cares). If there's no IBM response, I will seek a >non-IBMer and portions my bcc: list will make it to next week's a cc: list. > >Thank you for your attention and support. > >Al > > > > >Al Barsa, Jr. >Barsa Consulting, LLC >400 > 390 > >Phone: 914-251-9400 >Fax: 914-251-9406 > >+--- >| This is the Midrange System Mailing List! >| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". >| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. >| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com >+--- > Glenn Glenn Ericson © 1997 all rights reserved Ph 718 898 9805 Fax 718 446 1150 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.