• Subject: Re: Logical file index size too small?
  • From: "James W. Kilgore" <qappdsn@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 15:01:11 +0000
  • Organization: Progressive Data Systems, Inc.



Buck Calabro wrote:

> <snip>
> While doing a DSPFD, I noticed that the index size for some
> of these logicals is really small: 16384.  This doesn't
> make any sense because the key length is 36 bytes: I'm
> expecting something closer to 95 megs!
>
>

I think you'll find your answer right here:

> Implicit access path sharing  . . . . . :            Yes
>  <snip>
> Shared access path attributes
>   Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . :            *IMMED
>   Access path recovery  . . . . . . . . :            *NO
>   Force keyed access path . . . . . . . :            *NO
>   Keys must be unique . . . . . . . . . :            No
> ...

Some other, previously recreated, logical has the same index fields (and maybe
additional fields) which this logical is using.



+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.