|
From: Walden Leverich [SMTP:walden@techsoftinc.com] > This is the result of the new dynamic priority manager in V4R1.... I forgot to mention that the machine is currently running V3R6. AND: QDynPtyScd=0=off! > Having said that, I'm surprised that the priority was increased for an ending >job, > after all if an ending job is not ending fast enough who cares?. > Unless: > Are you using commitment control? ... Yes. And it seems to be a rather DB intensive job. Good guess! Looks as if the system does more dynamic priority adjustments than we would expect. Regards, Rudi
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
