|
From: Walden Leverich [SMTP:walden@techsoftinc.com] > This is the result of the new dynamic priority manager in V4R1.... I forgot to mention that the machine is currently running V3R6. AND: QDynPtyScd=0=off! > Having said that, I'm surprised that the priority was increased for an ending >job, > after all if an ending job is not ending fast enough who cares?. > Unless: > Are you using commitment control? ... Yes. And it seems to be a rather DB intensive job. Good guess! Looks as if the system does more dynamic priority adjustments than we would expect. Regards, Rudi
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
