• Subject: RE: Win95 - CA/400 session limit
  • From: boothm@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 05 Feb 98 21:40:45 -0500
  • In-Reply-To: <c=US%a=_%p=Denso_Manufactur%l=DMTN/EXCHANGE/00021AC7@101mail.dmtn.com>

on 02/05/98at 09:35 AM,  our friend Mark Welte <MWelte@dmtn.com> said:


>Normally, I would agree with you about the mystery originating with 
>Rochester, MN. But lately, I've come to believe that not everything  that
>goes wrong with Client Access is IBM's fault.

That is my experience too.  Troubles seem to vary by patch-level of win
95, not by level of Client Access.  Machines without troubles begin to
have CA troubles when a new MS upgrade or change is made.

----------------------------------------------------
Booth Martin     
---------------------------------------------------



+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.