RE: Win95 vs Lose95

[John Carr <74711.77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

RE:     RE: Win95 vs Lose95

Gee bob, I'd thought you'd give me a feasible suggestion to use
maybe like CP/M or something.  Ya, my local Circuit City store
has sooo many shrinkwrapped preinstalled OS's to choose from.

Like that(Linux) would be an option for 100 million home users without
a computer science degree. 

"You do have choices"  Can I quote you on that bob?   Reminds me of the 
comment one voter made to another leaving a voting booth in Russia 
in the 1960's.

Right.  As if.
John  
End Of Thread.

--------------------
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 09:30:09

Bob's "workable" suggestion.
So if in your opinion, Win95 is so bad, why do you use it?
Load up one of those "free" os's like Linux.  You do have 
choices.

Bob



-----Original Message-----

RE:     RE: Win95 - CA/400 session limit

Bob
I'm sitting at home with a Lose95(read WIN95) machine without CA and it
locks up at least 3 times a night.  Don'tcha think a multi-gazillion dollar
company who spent 5(is it 10?) years developing this thing, could make it
not lock up just because a single app hangs?  I know.. its not their fault.
(Question - what is the prescribed corrective action to a WIN95 problem ?
Answer -  FORMAT C: {as was explained to me via phone by the support staff})
John

-------------------------------------------------------------
Bob wrote:
A mystery from Redmond?  When your AS/400 based application
software blows up, do you blame IBM?  Why do you blame Microsoft 
for CAWin?

Your windows machine crashes on a regular basis?  Remove CAWin
and see how often it crashes.

I think this mystery originates in Rochester MN.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From:   HankHeath@aol.com [SMTP:HankHeath@aol.com]
Sent:   Wednesday, February 04, 1998 8:44 PM
To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Subject:        Re: Win95 - CA/400 session limit

Eric's point is well taken. I agree, although it is irrelevant.
The user likes
to run multiple queries simultaneously to "green screen"
sessions. How
efficient is this? not at all. However, they were doing it with
Win 3.1. Now
they cannot do it with Win 95. Yet another mystery from Redmond.

Hank Heath

In a message dated 98-02-02 22:08:12 EST, EKempter@smsocs.com
(Kempter, Eric)
wrote:

<< 4 sessions?  Can one user efficiently utilize 4 sessions?  It 
seems
 excessive. >>
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to
"MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to 
"MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to 
"MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
david@midrange.com
+---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---