I don't know which uses more resources 
on the /400; but, if I had to guess, I would say TCP/IP.  However, I don't 
think it is enough to effect overall performance.  On the other hand, 
TCP/IP on the client side is much more reliable and far less of a resource hog 
than NS/Router.  You shouldn't discount TCP/IP too 
quickly.
 
JMHO ;-),
 
 
 
>Hi!
>
>My 
boss is trying to convince me that using SNA/APPN (using NS/Router)
>uses 
way more AS/400 system resources than TCP/IP on V3R7. I am not
>buying 
that so we are having a bit of a "discussion" about the ways 
to
>connect LAN-to-LAN clients in the future.
>
>I would 
really like to hear your opinions on the subject.
>
>Also, where can 
I find a network layer diagram with the 7 layers and
>things such as LLC, 
DLC, 802.2, SNA, AnyNet, APPN and APPC in it. Or is
>there any other way 
to find information about what all these really are
>online? Seems like a 
terrible mess to me.
>
> Best regards, Juris.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
	
 
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.