• Subject: Re: EMC DASD (wasCISC to RISC conversion of data)
  • From: Dave Mahadevan <mahadevan@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 11:05:35 -0400
  • Organization: Stoner and Associates

Neil:

Neil Palmer wrote:

> So, IMHO, the reason 3rd party disk is cheaper, is because IT'S NO BLOODY GOOD
> !!!!

I hate to disagree with this statement.  But the truth is EMC DASD is as good
as.  They have grabbed a huge market share and growing by leaps and bounds.  The
customers are all not that stupid, right?  I have used their DASD without
trouble.  OTOH, 3 of my 9332-600 failed.   Everybody of course knows the
fantastic unreliability of 9335.   Blanket statements like this only cause
misunderstanding.  I believe all DASD manufacturers try their best.   I do
believe that mirroring now is the best choice considering the price of DASD in
general to avoid disk crashes (been there done that).

--
Thank You.

Regards

Dave Mahadevan.. mailto:mahadevan@fuse.net


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.