|
I recently switched from using Client Access connected via twinax & Netsoft router to Client Access using Ethernet and TCP/IP to connect to our 9404-200. For the longest time I heard how much faster I would be able to connect without having to use the dreaded Netsoft router. With a twinax connection, double-clicking on the desktop-created icon took about 1 minute to get a signon screen. (Using Client Access V3R1M3 with current service pack). When I switched to TCP/IP, I wiped client access completely from the machine (Pentium 166MMX with 48MB RAM) and reinstalled and applied the service pack. I was a little disappointed to discover that it took roughly the same amount of time to get a signon screen via TCP/IP and Ethernet(60 seconds). But, I didn't think too much of it. I've now tried a couple of plain old Telnet clients, and I get to a sign on screen on THE SAME MACHINE, within ONE SECOND. WHAT GIVES HERE??? Is there THAT much overhead with Client Access ? Is there a configuration issue here I'm overlooking... Any ideas would be greatly appreciated... +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.