Re: SRCDBG LSTDBG

[Richard Baird <rbbaird@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff,

It's my understanding that there is no performance hit unless you are
running in debug mode.   The objects are bigger and take much more
disk to store, but only the executable portion of the code is loaded
when the program is called.

Rick


Jeff Carey wrote:
> 
> Does anyone have any experience with the performance overhead associated
> with running OPM programs (in our case COBOL and CL) that are compiled with
> the SRCDBG or LSTDBG options?  We are at V3R7 and planning o go to V4R2 in
> the near future.
> 
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---