• Subject: Re: LIBL limitation of 25 libraries
  • From: email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (James W Kilgore)
  • Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 01:04:38 -0800
  • Organization: Progressive Data Systems, Inc.

Paul,

How do you feel about 3rd party products stuffing parts into QUSRSYS?
Would that be OK with you?  How about loading ALL applications from the same
vendor into a single library, regardless of their distribution organization?

The reason I ask is because within our install package we ask for the library
name for certain components and the user can specify the same library name for
every slot.  It's not that we -require- separate libraries, we just like to give
the option to satisfy an in-house security policy.

James W. Kilgore
email@James-W-Kilgore.com

PaulMmn wrote:

> Please define properly:  I don't like the idea of 3rd party products
> stuffing parts of themselves into the QSYS library.  Just makes me nervous.
> (:  I'll keep our utility libraries.
>

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.